PEERtrainer

 
SMTWTFS
1234
567891011
12131415[16]1718
19202122232425
262728293031
Return  to today's entries


   
malenka1's profile

malenka1

     

Member: malenka1
Member Since: 12/1/2007
City: Vancouver, BC, Canada

Before:
Roughly 55 kg or 120 lbs
After:
Roughly 45 kg or 100 lbs. Was at this weight in late 2010 and again in early 2013. Goal to be here again by 2016 Dec 01.

My Goal:
MY LOG: http://www.calorieking.com/public/MALENKA/

RMR = 1145 (5' tall or 152 cm)
May 08 goal = 99 lbs
July 01 goal = 95 lbs or 43kg (BMI 18.6)
Thereafter = add ~ 3 lbs muscle.

I log in desktop software and upload it to a public site, where it improperly shows small meals as "early morning snack".

Metric to Imperial:
28 grams = 1 oz
30 ml = 1 fl. oz
250 ml = 1 cup
1.6 km - 1 mile
1 kg = 2.2 lbs


About me:
I am a professional living in Greater Vancouver, BC. I am 151 cm (4' 11.5") and small framed, so my RMR is very low and I burn far fewer calories in exercise. I might mention here that the bit of brain which controls appetite strongly believes that I am a 6'8" lumberjack. Other important tidbits about me: - I stay in groups in which we mutually support each other. - I am completely open to new ideas if evidence based. I am not cool with woo. Please read the rest of my group member profile, and see http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Food_woo


Diets I like:
Vegetables, fruit, whole grains, healthy fats, and low-fat proteins. Calorie counting. Exercise (walk, run, weights).


Workout of choice:
Jog-run. Completed about 15 half marathons; typically three per year until an injury three years ago. Injury healed so preparing for another half marathon 2016 October 23.


My plan:
GOAL: 26.6 lb loss to 95 lbs (43 kg/20.4 BMI) then gain muscle.

To help non-petites understand petite numbers: 95 pounds is for me what 117 pounds would be for a 5' 4" woman (average sized woman) as these are both ~ 20.4 new BMI.


I need the most help with:
It is helpful to me when others back up their claims with evidence or at least say the info they are providing is purely a question without evidence.
I am trying to learn patience with people who say random sh*t without any evidentiary basis (e.g., "artificial sweeteners are bad"; "cleanses are good ... they get rid of "toxins" "; "gluten is bad" (and they are not talking about persons diagnosed with celiac disease); "vaccines cause autism"... this list is endless. Or where horribly weak evidence is offered like isolated testimonials ("I did x and it worked for me!"). There is nothing wrong with using personal experience to come up with a hypothesis (I do), but a hypothesis is not a conclusion.


Additional Info:
RESEARCH LINKS

Food Woo: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Food_woo

Fiber: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15797686

Fiber: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19335713

Detox myth Video: http://infactvideo.com/episode/02/02/

Detox myth Article: http://www.skepdic.com/detox.html

Paleo is a BS fad diet: http://www.nsca.com/videos/conference_lectures/the_paleo_diet_claims_vs_evidence/

Appetite stim/sup: http://examine.com/topics/Appetite/

Wheatgrass myth: http://infactvideo.com/episode/01/03/

Low carb diets: http://www.quackwatch.org /06ResearchProjects/lcd.html

Aspartame safety: http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/are-artificial-sweeteners-safe/

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23891579

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8mDX6aWyX8

Sucralose safety: http://www.kon.org/urc/frank.html

1% of population is actually gluten intolerant: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/20/gluten-free-diet-myths-video_n_3288200.html