malenka1's profile



Member: malenka1
Member Since: 12/1/2007
City: Vancouver, BC, Canada

Roughly 120 lbs or 55 kg)
Roughly 100 lbs (45 kg). Was at this weight in late 2010 and again in early 2013. Goal to be here again by Nov 2016

My Goal:
On its website, CK mislabels all snacks as "early morning snack".

RMR = 1145 (5' tall or 152 cm)
Exercise: 45 cal = 1 km (roughly)

GOALS 2014
(Lose 27 lbs)
Mar 31 = 122.4 lbs (55.5 kg or 24 BMI)
Jul 01 = 116 lbs
Sep 01 = 110 lbs
Oct 01 = 106 lbs
Nov 01 = 103 lbs
Dec 01 = 100 lbs
Mar 01 = 95 lbs (43 kg or 18.6 BMI)
Sep 01 (2015) = 98 lbs (add 3 lbs muscle over 6 mos).

About me:
I am a professional living in Greater Vancouver, BC. I am 4' 11.5"(151 cm) and small framed, so my RMR is very low and I burn far fewer calories in exercise. I might mention here that the bit of brain which controls appetite strongly believes that I am a 6'8" lumberjack. Other important tidbits about me: - I stay in groups in which we mutually support each other. - I am completely open to new ideas if evidence based. I am not cool with woo. Please read the rest of my group member profile, and see

Diets I like:
Vegetables, fruit, whole grains, healthy fats, and low-fat proteins. Calorie counting. Exercise (walk, run, weights).

Workout of choice:
Jog-run. Completed about 15 half marathons; typically three per year until a couple years ago. Starting to re-introduce calisthenics and weights.

My plan:
GOAL: 25.4 lb loss to 97 lbs (44 kg/BMI 19.3) with increased muscle.

To help non-petites understand petite numbers: 93 pounds is for me what 127 pounds would be for the average size North American woman (BMI 18.6).

I need the most help with:
It is helpful to me when others back up their claims with evidence or at least say the info they are providing is purely a question without evidence.
I am trying to learn patience with people who say random sh*t without any evidentiary basis (e.g., "artificial sweeteners are bad"; "cleanses are good ... they get rid of "toxins" "; "gluten is bad" (and they are not talking about persons diagnosed with celiac disease); "vaccines cause autism"... this list is endless. Or where horribly weak evidence is offered like isolated testimonials "I did x and it worked for me!"). There is nothing wrong with using personal experience to come up with a hypothesis (I do), but a hypothesis is not a conclusion.

Additional Info:

Food Woo:



Detox myth Video:

Detox myth Article:

Paleo is a BS fad diet:

Appetite stim/sup:

Wheatgrass myth:

Low carb diets: /06ResearchProjects/lcd.html

Aspartame safety:

Sucralose safety:

1% of population is actually gluten intolerant: